Majorityrights Central > Category: White Nationalism

As enquiries go, “why we fight” is a popular one.  Frank Capra gave it to his propaganda films made between 1942 and 1945.  Stephen Spielberg took it for the Band of Brothers episode given over to Holocaust propaganda, and Eugene Jarecki took it for his 2005 documentary on the evil conjunction of war, business and American geopolitical hegemony.  More apposite to us, Guillaume Faye wrote a book with that title.  And then David Lane, while he never posed that precise question, wrote a precise answer in just fourteen words.

Well, what is our cause?  It is simply preservationist?  Or is it distant, glorious and aspirational?  Something else?  Why do we struggle?

Today I started a thread with the same title at British Democracy Forum.  The usual suspects rushed in with buckets of cold water to douse any expressions of real nationalist feeling.  They need not have worried.  The BNP leadership election, which Griffin will win, has the full and undivided attention of the forum members.  There is less thinking going on than ever.  It would be a pleasure to encounter a few considered opinions here.

by Ivan

The true logic for this world is the calculus of probabilities, which takes account of the magnitude of the probability which is, or ought to be, in a reasonable man’s mind.

James Clerk Maxwell (1850)

This short essay would not have come to pass if not for one of the best Grimoire comments ever, on one hand, where he pondered over the question (very intelligently, by the way, with lots of very useful and very truthful observations; I encourage everyone to reread it while paying close attention to everything he had to say in that comment:

How likely is it that Ivan is not a jew and not a liar?

... and, on the other hand, if Guessedworker hadn’t agreed to publish it. These two individuals have very different personalities, each with his own character traits, type of intelligence, mentality, temperament, perhaps agenda, etc.  But they have at least one thing in common, or so it seems: they both agree that Ivan is batshit crazy. So, in order to show my appreciation to both of them for their roles in the birth of this essay, I picked a title that would sound positively batshit crazy: Probability Theory and Survival of White Race.

Where is Probability Theory and where is Survival of White Race? How could a person, who is not batshit crazy, put these two topics next to each other to form a sentence? Put him in the mental institution, or better yet, show compassion - get him up against the wall to relieve him from his misery and suffering.

Let me point out from the outset: this is not a mathematical treatise; it does not assume the reader to be knowledgeable in any branch of mathematics.  The only assumption is that Survival of White Race is a topic of genuine interest to the reader, one way or the other.

READ MORE...

I was impressed by the art and simplicity of this anti-miscegenation video published on YouTube by Divine Fellowship.  It was brought to the attention of BDF readers today by someone I respect.

The imagery, the writing, the voicing by Julian Lee, and the message are all beautifully-crafted.  It was uploaded on May Day this year, and is the second of thirty-three parts under the title White People Are Cool, all devoted to the preservation of our people.

by Alexander Baron

A recent issue of the Telegraph Magazine contained a lengthy article about a race conscious and extremely insular minority who are thriving in London. This community is not exactly prosperous, far from it; their large families and unwillingness to move with the times – that double entendre we call progress - condemns many of them to a life of what most of us would call relative poverty. Us maybe, not them, for as the song goes:

“...money have I none,
But I’ve got silver in the stars,
And gold in the morning sun.”

This minority has no desire either to integrate or to assimmilate; from academic studies it is clear that crime amongst them is extremely low, and such 21st Century niceties as AIDS, other sexual diseases, juvenile deliquency and the range of mental afflictions most of us seem to suffer at some time – from anorexia to depression, from bulimia to schizophrenia – are all but absent from them.

Most curiously, this exclusively white minority is never accused of that most heinous of crimes – “racism” – at least not by the mainstream liberal establishment. Their insularity is not only taken for granted but accommodated, although unlike other far more prosperous minorities, they are extremely averse to taking any sort of state handout.

Oh, to be an Orthodox Jew!

READ MORE...

I recall visiting Joe Sobran’s site some years ago and coming across a remark to the effect that the very existence of ethnic Europe is an unbearable reminder to the races flooding our lands of their existential inferiority, and our destruction is the only means by which they can look at their reflection in the mirror.  It’s a sentiment I’ve seen since many times on the nationalist internet.  It certainly explains why, when one finds oneself in conversation with a non-white, the will to racial supremacy is always presumed to hide behind all our words.  It does no good to explain that the racial separation we seek cannot, by definition, afford us opportunities to oppress anybody.  Those nationalists who have concluded that the animus is felt too deeply for the foreign to ever release its grip willingly are doubtless correct.

That leaves us with two options.  Persuasion or more persuasion.  More persuasion would be messy.  We must hope that just persuasion, allied to political power, is enough.

So I wonder whether there isn’t some advantage to be got from a discourse of global freedom to accompany the gesture towards the door.  After all, the fear of European racial supremacism is fifty years out of date and counting.  It is the totality of the Money Power, with its favoured political, business and “ethnic” actuators and clients, which is the coming oppressor.

And if this idea doesn’t chime too much with the Third World colonisers - and it probably won’t - it must offer something to that emotional constituency among our own kind described by Desmond Jones on the Pastor Manning thread thus:

The Anglo-Saxon, being the highest trust society, is able to extend his sympathy not just to his own, but men of foreign nations, men of all races and finally, all sentient beings.

OK, don’t get stuck on the Anglo-Saxon thing.  A beautiful but costly empathy is common to all Europeans, and my interest here lies only in the utility of the notion that ethnic Europe is the last bastion of freedom for the world as well as for ourselves.  After the Olam Ha-ba of a European panmixia there will be nothing.  Liberals who cannot comprehend why our race matters to themselves might perhaps comprehend why it matters to the rest of the world, and thereby find a reason to allow the justice and morality of its survival.

So we would say to them: you must try to understand what is at stake, and what Nationalists are really trying to do. You just can’t get past the racism thing now. But you must. Whether you like it or not, we have to separate from our replacers so that ethnic Europe survives and can take down the interest groups which seek to enslave us all.

Just a thought.

by Christian Miller ©

Christian has asked me to explain at the outset that by no means does he claim to cover all the ground of raising our children as self-aware members of the white race.  But he is hoping to spark some discussion among readers and perhaps some new ideas about this extremely important subject.
GW

Above all, a White child must be raised to exhibit White behavior: to strive towards truth, honor, and a virtuous life.  Exemplary White men and White women from the past and present provide guidance for behavior expected in the future.  Familiarity with admirable White role models will help protect a developing mind from poisonous, nonsensical, cowardly, and traitorous ideas.  The alternative is the loss of yet another young White mind and spirit, overwhelmed from all sides in today’s twisted and subversive society. 

Popular music and professional sports are teeming with African themes of criminality, cruelty, misogyny, egotism, and debased and debauched behavior.  Television, movies, and advertising are infected with a virulent strain of anti-White propaganda.  Academia, mainstream news, politicians, and pundits provide a persistent message of White guilt, racial nihilism, and shrill condemnation of any manifestation of White pride or White identity.  Jewish ownership and control of the media is so pervasive that Jewish media figures feel secure enough to boast thereof.  Yet to an untrained observer, the subversion towards Jewish interests or anti-White propaganda can be difficult to spot because it is designed to permeate the unconscious brain.  The viewer, or victim, is supposed to feel and absorb, not think and reflect.  Conscientious White parents must prepare their children with the analytical tools to see through the façade. 

An inert consumer, or a passive viewer, will unconsciously accept the bald-faced lies and distortions via the path of the least resistance.  Floating down the river in a stupefied trance is easier than swimming upstream against the tide of brainwashing.  Responsible White parents must be vigilant and tirelessly optimistic while pursuing their most important endeavor—raising the next generation of the White race.

READ MORE...

by PF

Inspired by Soren’s radio show with Kievsky and Parrott.

What is the purpose of anger?

Anger is an emotion which is triggered in the human being when an important boundary is crossed in word or deed.

Anger is vital for human beings because anger, unlike the various reasoning processes which are spun out as a response to it, honestly and indubitably allows both parties in an interaction to understand where a boundary is. Human reasoning processes paper over the emotional processes that drive them and are thus deceptive. Reasonings are usually corrupted by imitation, status-signaling, dissimulation, general confusion and self-deception, and thus cannot be trusted to reliably signal the exact position of boundaries. Anger can be relied upon, because it is difficult to properly fake,  and so is an evolutionarily stable signal for establishing where boundaries are.

In the recent evolution of white culture a method of discourse has been invented which suppressed expressions of anger in favor of a cold, detached, logical style. This is ideal for arguing objective relationships about facts, but at the same time is fundamentally dishonest, insofar as the most essential component of human interaction is elided over. This method of discourse still holds a high status as both a method of signalling aloofness, and an aspired to argumentative style which puts one beyond the vagaries of emotion (ostensibly).

Now rational argument was founded in order to facilitate the discussion of abstract thinking, which is the necessary precursor to univeralism. Emotional discussions are by their nature non-universalist because only genetic proximity will motivate people to care enough about the emotional proclivities of another person to actually study what their ‘triggers’ are. (absent white social experimentation). In other words, few people outside your family care what you are feeling. Those people who do care what you are feeling are people sufficiently similar to you to either want to be your friend, or enter a romantic relationship with you, and as empirical studies have shown, both of these things typically signal a degree of higher relatedness anyway. The point is that one’s personal feelings become less interesting as one moves outside the concentric rings of one’s established family. At each EGI fault line there is a degradation in the ‘clarity of signal’ being broadcast emotionally, so it is very hard to get honest emotional communication with foreigners for a variety of reasons (I have cited only one: lack of motivation).

READ MORE...

by Karl LaForce

diversity, cult of n mass psychosis of, or artificially-induced religious belief in, the essential identicality of all featherless bipeds on the planet earth (see main entry for humanoid), aka equality, universal human equality, egalitarianism (see index of known synonyms, diversity);

Explanatory note:

Cult followers of all racial groups are believed to exist.  However, genetically European people make up the great majority.  The editorial staff of the Aryan New World Dictionary propose that this fact is due to malicious exploitation by senior cult leadership of a particular genetic tendency among Europeans. During the evolution process, Europeans developed, more so than the other races, a genetically driven tendency to avoid conflict and help others. This tendency developed due to the need to work with others in order to survive the harsh northern winters; ie, it developed due to unique environmental selective pressures.

As a rule, cult members exhibit moderate to high levels of logical thinking, and may posses a respectable intellect (IQ of 120 or more). However cult followers will ignore/reject/dispute all falsification of cult doctrine. Self-evident fact and even critically important life-saving information becomes unimportant in the minds of cult followers when the false nature of cult doctrine conflicts with the cult-induced subconscious processes of control. Cult followers currently exercise a high degree of control over the public affairs of North America, Western Europe, and Australia.

Exposing cult members to truth can have unexpected results, including extreme irrationally. The cult senior leaders do not believe that the doctrines of the cult are true (note: the senior leadership of the cult appear to have no understanding of or fondness for truth). Cult leaders practice various forms of a religion, the tenets of which are in-group superiority over all other groups; see main entry for Jews. Cult leadership maintains control over cult members primarily through directed propaganda delivered by the controlled mass media; see main article for Propasphere. Second, control of cult members is maintained through the government, financial sector, and mainstream religious organizations; see main entry for ZOG.

scientific racism n part of the abnormal psychology of the cult of diversity relating to prescribed belief in the supposed non-existence of human difference and the evil of uncovering actual difference between human groups; see main entry for diversity, cult and abnormal psychology; also see main entry for magic, pathological belief in, for actual definition see the main entry for science; in common with all categories of racism, an appeal to summon the cult’s sacred god, diversity, after which cult followers may demand that the accused recant of said “racism”, ridicule his belief in science, logic and reason, seek to destroy his home and work life, force/suggest/cajole him into becoming a cult follower (normally by insisting that the accused avow cult doctrines, reject all forms of inequality, make a peace offering by praising Jews and negroes); pert. cult the emotional rejection of scientific data which reinforces a negative racial stereotype of non-Europeans but not Europeans; the emotional rejection of scientific data supporting the existence of any non-visible difference in the average characteristics of racial groups, such as average intelligence, average ability to obey accepted behavioral norms, ability to maintain employment, except differences negatively pertaining to Europeans, such as data indicating that Africans run faster; in mystical diversity, scientific racism is considered the patron demon of Nazism, and is junior only to anti-Semitism in the demonic pantheon.